بنیان‌ های سیاست خارجی عمان و جایگاه‌یابی منطقه‌ای در نظام منطقه‌ ای خلیج فارس (2010-2023)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری علوم سیاسی، گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه یاسوج، یاسوج، ایران.

2 دانشیار روابط بین الملل، گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران.

3 دانشیار علوم سیاسی، گروه روابط بین الملل، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده
معادلات منطقه‌ای در زیرسیستم خلیج‌فارس همواره اصلی‌ترین متغیر تعیین‌کننده در نظم و ثبات در خاورمیانه بوده و در این میان، نقش قدرت‌های منطقه‌ای همواره جزئی جدایی‌ناپذیر از این فرایند بوده است. کشور عمان اگرچه هیچ‌گاه در مقام قدرت منطقه‌ای ظاهر نشده اما در یک دهه اخیر الگوهایی از رفتار را در سیاست خارجی نمایانده که تردیدی در تلاش این سلطان‌نشین در جایگاه‌یابی منطقه‌ای باقی نمی‌گذارد. مقاله حاضر با هدف تبیین روندها و بنیان‌های سیاست خارجی عمان در تحقق این جایگاه‌یابی با طرح این پرسش که چه بسترهایی برای تحقق این هدف در سیاست خارجی مسقط وجود دارد؟ بر این نظر است عملکرد این کشور در سه حوزه تمایل، ظرفیت و پذیرش برای جایگاه‌یابی منطقه‌ای در حدود یک دهه گذشته زمینه را برای این ایفای نقش مهیا کرده است. این مقاله با بهره‌گیری از چارچوب مفهومی جایگاه‌یابی منطقه‌ای و روش علت کاوی در استنتاج دلایل و بسترهای این ایفای نقش به این نتیجه دست یافته است که عملکرد عمان در تلاش برای میانجی‌گری در بحران‌های منطقه‌ای، اتخاذ رویکرد میانه برای حل چالش‌های ساختاری، عملکرد غیرایدئولوژیک در مواجهه با مسائل منجر شده است تا ظرفیت و پذیرش منطقه‌ای این کشور ارتقا یافته و مسیر جایگاه‌یابی منطقه‌ای برای این کشور تسهیل شود.


 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

The Foundations of Oman’s Foreign Policy and Regional Positioning in the Persian Gulf Regional System (2010-2023)

نویسندگان English

Ayenehdar , Farshad 1
Fariborz Arghavani Pirsalami 2
seyed javad salehi 3
1 PhD student in Political Science, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Yasuj University, Yasuj, Iran.
2 Associate Professor of International Relations, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
3 Associate Professor of Political Science, Department of International Relations, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

As one of the most important functional regions in the world, the Persian Gulf region holds a significant position in the power equations and regional arrangements, particularly in terms of politics, economy, and security. The importance of this region for governments throughout history has been a platform for political and military competitions and challenges, to the extent that most wars and security conflicts have taken place in this regional systemOman is one of the important and influential Arab countries - a member of the Gulf Cooperation Council - in the Persian Gulf regional system, which has traditionally been one of Iran’s most important allies over the centuries. Despite having many cultural and civilizational similarities with other Persian Gulf actors, this country has different and distinctive characteristics, especially in its foreign policy approaches. Since the mid-1980s, Omani policy has been to adopt a policy of neutrality and build multi-layered friendships with regional and international actors, and they have generally refrained from directly engaging in issues that have a thorny aspect. Political realism has led Omanis to a position where they have simultaneously been able to establish appropriate relations between opposing and rival actors, such as the United States and Iran, China and India, and Iran and Saudi Arabia. The policy of avoiding tension is so deeply rooted in the foundations of Omani foreign policy that the country made non-interference in alignments against Iran one of its main conditions for joining the Gulf Cooperation Council, and it has striven to maintain it to this day.
Omanis do not have the same financial and oil resources as their neighbors and do not play a role in the energy market. Accordingly, they are trying to take full advantage of the confrontation between Iran and the West. In this regard, they are trying to be the axis of energy transfer from Central Asia to other regions and, given their strategic location in the Sea of ​​Oman and the Makran region, take on the role of a "strategic actor". To achieve this goal, they are trying to create multi-layered and diverse interactions and play the role of a "mediating actor", and in this regard, Omanis have been among the most active countries present at regional and international conferences and meetings. In this regard, this research aims to examine the behavioral patterns of this country and its consequences within the framework of the foundations of Oman's foreign policy in the Persian Gulf regional system, given the importance and influence of Oman. Considering this issue, it can be said that the foundations of Oman's foreign policy, even after Sultan Qaboos, have been relatively stable based on political realism, the use of strategic-geopolitical capacities, and complex interactions with other actors. On this basis, despite the dynamics, developments, and changes in power equations and the occurrence of crises at the regional level, Oman's foreign policy in the regional system has continued in an independent, impartial, and balanced manner within the framework of intelligent diplomacy, bilateral and multilateral dialogues and cooperation in various economic, political, and security fields actively and systematically. These behavioral patterns have ultimately introduced this country as an active actor in the Persian Gulf regional system and have paved the way for enhancing the country's position in the Persian Gulf-Middle East regional system and the international system. This article aims to explain the trends and foundations of Oman's foreign policy in achieving this positioning by raising the question of what conditions exist in Muscat's foreign policy for achieving this goal. It is of the opinion that the country's performance in the three areas of desire, capacity, and acceptance for regional positioning over the past decade has prepared the ground for this role.
Focusing on this question, the results of this article show that in the area of ​​desire, Muscat's foreign policy, due to avoiding ideological attitudes and replacing realistic leaders, has sought growth and progress, expanding interaction, and ultimately gaining a position at the regional level. Today, Oman's declared programs at various levels and the volume of exchanges of this country in this region indicate its serious desire for regional positioning.
In the area of ​​capacities, which can be seen in investments, exchanges, and political and economic relations in the region, Oman's economic power and the expansion of economic influence in the Middle East and the Persian Gulf region clearly demonstrate the conditions for playing a role. In the current period, few researchers doubt Oman's economic, cultural, and political developments. In the area of ​​acceptance, Oman has been able to gain the satisfaction of the countries of the region. In the theoretical field, factors such as realism, tolerance, political neutrality, etc., have made Oman attractive. In practical terms, the huge volume of exchanges between regional countries and political mediations between regional countries, especially in relation to Iran, and above all the nuclear program of the Islamic Republic, and European and Western countries, can be evaluated in this context. Therefore, the series of developments that have taken place indicate that Oman's regional positioning has been moving forward in the last decade and, despite the change in the country's internal leadership, it has still been a source of playing an effective role in filling the gaps within the region in the regional order of the Persian Gulf, and has also been able to be a reliable source for political and security exchanges between the region and the level of the international system and the role of great powers in this region. In this study, an attempt was made to address how this role is instilled using the theoretical foundations of regional positioning; although these relations and this path were not and are not without challenges. The fragility of the region's security structure, polar divisions over fundamental regional crises such as the Palestinian issue and border disputes, and excessive expectations from regional rivals for Oman to take a clear and unilateral direction in times of crisis are the most important obstacles, the management of which by Muscat in the future could be a reflection of the success or failure of this country's regional positioning 

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Foreign policy
Oman
Persian Gulf region
regional positioning
Middle East
Akseki, E. (2010). Oman's foreign policy between 1970–2008 (Master's thesis, Middle East Technical University).
Al Handhali, K. Y. (2019). National identity and its impact on shaping Oman's contemporary foreign policy (Master's thesis).
Allen, C. H., & Rigsbee II, W. L. (2014). Oman under Qaboos: From coup to constitution, 1970–1996. Routledge.
Al-Khalili, M. (2006). Oman's foreign policy: Foundations and practice (Sa'id ibn Taimur, Sultan of Muscat and Oman).
Baabood, A. (2016). Oman’s independent foreign policy. In the small Gulf states’ foreign and security policies before and after the Arab Spring. Routledge.
Baabood, A. (2017). Oman and the Gulf diplomatic crisis. In Foreign policy trends in the GCC states.
Barth, F. (1983). Sohar: Culture and society in an Omani town. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bahgat, G. (2008). Security in the Persian Gulf: Perils and opportunities. Contemporary Security Policy, 29(2), 303–321.
Biyouk, M., & Akraminia, M. (2021). Explaining the role of geopolitical factors in Oman's foreign policy. Human Geography Research, 53(1), 283–305. [in Persian]
Buzkart, A., & Mercan, M. (2022). Oman’s foreign policy and its mediating and balancing role in the Middle East. Marmara University Journal of Political Science, 10(1), 179–190.
Cafiero, G. (2016). Oman and Iran: Friends with many benefits. Iranian Diplomacy.
Echague, A. (2015). Oman: The outlier. Policy Brief.
Ghubash, H. (2014). Oman—The Islamic democratic tradition. Routledge.
Goldman, A. (2016). Marine veteran held by Yemeni rebels since 2015 is freed. New York Times.
Harré, R., Moghaddam, F., et al. (2009). Recent advances in positioning theory. Theory & Psychology, 19(1), 5–31.
Hopwood, D. (1972). The Arabian Peninsula: Society and politics. Allen & Unwin.
Jones, J. (2014). Oman's quiet diplomacy. Norwegian Institute of International Affairs.
Katzman, K., et al. (2008). Iraq: Regional perspectives and US policy. Congressional Research Service.
Katzman, K. (2017). Oman: Politics, security, and US policy. Congressional Research Service.
Katzman, K. (2021). Oman: Politics, security, and US policy. Congressional Research Service.
Keohane, R. O. (1969). Review: Lilliputians' dilemmas: Small states in international politics. International Organization, 23(2), 291–310.
Kingah, S., & Quiliconi, C. (Eds.). (2016). Global and regional leadership of BRICS countries. Springer.
Kechichian, J. A. (1995). Oman and the world: The emergence of an independent foreign policy. Rand Corporation.
Kéchichian, J. A. (2008). A vision of Oman: State of the Sultanate speeches by Qaboos Bin Said, 1970–2006. Middle East Policy, 15(4), 112–133.
Ladwig III, W. C. (2008). Supporting allies in counterinsurgency: Britain and the Dhofar Rebellion. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 19(1), 62–88.
Lefebvre, J. A. (2010). Oman's foreign policy in the twenty-first century. Middle East Policy, 17(1), 99.
Mahmoudi Lamooki, M., & Seraji, S. (2018). A survey of the strategic importance of the Strait of Hormuz in the Middle East, with an emphasis on Iran's role in maintaining its security. International Journal of Political Science, 8(3), 71–78.
Nasirzadeh, M., & Mohammadalipour, F. (2021). Identity and neutrality in Oman's foreign policy in the Middle East. Fundamental and Applied Studies of the Islamic World, 3(8), 149–176. [in Persian]
 
Noble, P. C. (2019). The Arab system: Pressures, constraints, and opportunities. In The foreign policies of Arab states (pp. 49–102). Routledge.
Nolte, D. (2010). How to compare regional powers: Analytical concepts and research topics. Review of International Studies, 36(4), 881–901.
Office for the Preservation and Publication of the Works of Ayatollah Khamenei. (2015, June 23). Speech in meeting with government officials. Retrieved from https://farsi.khamenei.ir/speech-content?id=30069 [in Persian]
Peterson, J. E. (2004). Oman: Three and a half decades of change and development. Middle East Policy, 11(2), 125–137.
Peterson, J. E. (2004). Oman’s diverse society, Northern Oman. The Middle East Journal, 58(1), 32–51.
Phillips, A. (2015). Why the Iran deal is so huge for Obama’s legacy. The Washington Post.
Rieger, R. (2013). The foreign policy of the Arab Gulf monarchies from 1971 to 1990 (Doctoral dissertation, Middle East Politics).
Rozen, L. (2015). Inside the secret US-Iran diplomacy that sealed nuke deal. Al Monitor.
Sherwood, L. (2017). Understanding Oman’s foreign policy. Foreign Policy Trends in the GCC States, 11, 15.
Reinhart, T. (2011). Israel/Palestine: How to end the war of 1948. Seven Stories Press.
Van Langenhove, L., et al. (2016a). Conceptualising regional leadership: The positioning theory angle. In the Global and regional leadership of BRICS countries. Springer.
Valeri, M. (2009). Oman: Politics and society in the Qaboos state. Hurst Publishers.
Valeri, M. (2010). High visibility, low profile: The Shiʿa in Oman under Sultan Qaboos. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 42(2), 251–268.
Van Langenhove, L., et al. (2016b). Global and regional leadership of BRICS countries. Springer.
Worrall, J. (2021). “Switzerland of Arabia”: Omani foreign policy and mediation efforts in the Middle East. International Spectator, 56(4), 134–150.
Zolfaghari, M., et al. (2020). The Impact of Oman's Mediation Diplomacy on the Regional Security System of the Middle East. Islamic World Political Studies Quarterly, 3(169), 171–173. [in Persian]