فرصت‌ های نظام بین‌الملل در حال گذار برای جمهوری اسلامی ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشیار روابط بین الملل دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران

چکیده
ظهور و افول قدرت‌های بزرگ، همواره یکی از موضوعات مهم در نظام بین‌الملل بوده است. با شروع قرن بیست‌ویکم این گزاره در بین ناظران و تحلیل‌گران قوت گرفته که دوران گذار در نظام بین‌الملل شروع شده و نظم بین‌المللی مورد نظر ایالات متحده آمریکا بعد از فروپاشی شوروی در حال تغییر است. با توجه به تاکید نئورئالیسم بر تاثیر پذیری کشورها از نظام بین‌الملل، دوران گذار می‌تواند برای جمهوری اسلامی ایران به عنوان یکی از قدرت‌های منطقه‌ای دارای فرصت باشد. سئوال اصلی پژوهش عبارت است از: نظام بین‌الملل در حال گذار چه فرصت‌هایی برای جمهوری اسلامی ایران دارد؟ فرضیه پژوهش بیان می‌کند دوران نظام بین‌الملل در حال گذار فرصت‌هایی همچون همکاری راهبردی با قدرت‌های نوظهور، استفاده از ظرفیت ائتلاف‌ها و پیمان‌های منطقه‌ای و بین‌المللی، افزایش کنشگری قدرت معنایی و کاهش اثر تحریم‌ها را برای جمهوری اسلامی ایران فراهم می‌نماید. نتایج پژوهش بیانگر این است که نظام بین‌الملل در حال گذار برای کشورهایی همچون جمهوری اسلامی ایران که مخالف نظام بین‌الملل آمریکا محور بوده، فرصت‌هایی را فراهم نموده است که استفاده از فرصت‌ها برای تامین منافع ملی جمهوری اسلامی ایران ضرورت دارد. این پژوهش از نوع توصیفی – تحلیلی بوده و از منابع کتابخانه‌ای و پویش اینترنتی برای جمع‌آوری داده‌ها استفاده شده است.


 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

The opportunities of the international system in transition for the Islamic Republic of Iran

نویسندگان English

Rahbar Talei hur
Mahmood Reza Rahbar GHazi
reza Mahmoud oghli
MAU
چکیده English

The rise and fall of great powers has always been a significant subject in the international system. Since the beginning of the 21st century, the perception among observers and analysts has strengthened that a period of transition in the international system has begun, and the US-led international order after the collapse of the Soviet Union is changing. Given neorealism's emphasis on how states are influenced by the international system, this transitional period could present opportunities for the Islamic Republic of Iran as a regional power. Therefore, the main research question is: What opportunities does the transitioning international system offer the Islamic Republic of Iran? Using neorealist theory, the research hypothesis posits that the transitioning international system provides opportunities for Iran, such as strategic cooperation with emerging powers, utilizing the potential of regional and international alliances and treaties, enhancing the agency of discursive power, and reducing the impact of sanctions.
This study employs a descriptive-analytical research method. Data collection was conducted through library research, scholarly articles, and internet searches, and the information was analyzed qualitatively and interpretively using rational reasoning and analysis.
The international system is a concept that has been used since the 1960s to describe interactions among state actors. It encompasses the environment in which units of international politics operate, where their intentions, orientations, and demands are influenced by the international system itself. Throughout history, international systems have undergone transformations in two domains: evolutionary and paradigmatic. In the evolutionary domain, systems have progressed from limited, regional forms (such as those in Mesopotamia, Greece, China, India, Africa, etc.) to more comprehensive systems (like those in Asia and Europe), culminating in the 20th century with a global international system. In terms of paradigmatic change, the international system, with its specific logic, norms, and rules, has given way to new systems. Examples of such changes include the multipolar system pre-World War II, the bipolar system during the Cold War, and the unipolar system in the 1990s (Karami, 2004: 83). Consequently, the primary focus here is on the second type of transformation, which neorealism theory is particularly well-suited to explain.
Since the beginning of the 21st century, the proposition that a transitional period has begun in the international system has gained traction among observers and analysts. They posit that the international order envisioned by the United States following the collapse of the Soviet Union is undergoing significant change. Consequently, this transitional phase in the international system, which aligns with the interests of the Islamic Republic of Iran, can present certain opportunities for the country. The most significant of these opportunities will be outlined below.
Srategic Cooperation with Emerging Powers: The transitional period in the international system provides a conducive environment for cooperation with emerging powers. The Islamic Republic of Iran should leverage the internal contradictions within the international community currently evident between the United States (which advocates for maintaining the status quo) and certain powers such as Russia and China (which advocate for changing the status quo and playing an active role in the international system)—while bearing in mind that all actors in the international system seek to secure their national interests. By forging strategic ties with these countries, Iran can enhance its agency.
Utilizing the Potential of Regional and International Alliances and Treaties:Given that regional powers have gained greater opportunity and scope for active engagement in the transitioning international system, the formation of regional unions and alliances represents another opportunity presented by this transitional phase. With the aim of consolidating its political, security, and economic role in the region, ensuring national security against regional instabilities, and maximizing economic, social, political, security, and cultural cooperation with its neighbors, the Islamic Republic of Iran can foster regional convergence by reducing points of divergence with both neighboring and non-neighboring countries. This is because, with the decline of U.S. power during the transition of the international system and the emergence of new powers, countries' dependence on the United States has diminished, thereby creating grounds for convergence, union, and alliance among nations.
Enhancing the Agency of Discursive Power: Accordingly, given that the transitioning international system provides a foundation for the emergence of cultural power, discursive power, soft power, and norm-setting power, this situation presents an opportunity for the Islamic Republic of Iran. In this context, owing to its possession of discursive and normative power, Iran can attain a distinct position and role, enabling it to exert influence within the international system.
Reducing the Impact of Economic Sanctions: In the context of the transitioning international system, the formation of regional organizations with an economic focus and effective participation in them can serve as a strategy to mitigate the impact of economic sanctions. The Islamic Republic of Iran’s membership in BRICS and other regional organizations can create opportunities to alleviate economic sanctions. If the power of such organizations is strengthened, BRICS countries can support Iran in international forums and help reduce political pressure on the country. This support may include opposing unilateral sanctions.
Conclusion
Throughout history, no similar pattern has consistently dominated power relations in the international system, which has undergone transformations corresponding to historical conditions. Changes in the structure of the international system have not only influenced its constituent units but have also been influenced by political units themselves. Following World War II, a bipolar structure prevailed in the international system, which shifted to a unipolar structure with the collapse of the Soviet Union and the rise of American power. Given recent changes in the international order and the gradual weakening of US hegemony, a transitional period has begun in the international system, which could present significant opportunities for the Islamic Republic of Iran as a regional power opposed to the US-centric order.Based on the theoretical framework of neorealism, which emphasizes the influence of the international system's structure on states, Iran can utilize these developments to strengthen its position. This transitional period offers opportunities such as strategic cooperation with emerging powers, leveraging regional and international alliances, enhancing agency based on discursive power, and mitigating the impact of sanctions.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

International System
in transition
Islamic Republic of Iran
Coalition
Semantic Power
Al-Rodhan, K. R. (2007). A critique of the China threat theory: A systematic analysis. Asian Perspective, 31(3).
Badar Aalm, Iqbal (2015). “Emergence of BRICS as an Economic Bloc”. Journal Transna-tional Corporations Review, 7(1), 110-120.[DOI: 10.5148/tncr.2015.7107]
Bagheri, M., Omidi, A., & Yazdani, E. (1400). The impact of the resistance axis on the strategic depth of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Quarterly Journal of Political Studies of the Islamic World, 2, 65–92. [in Persian]
Bill, J. A. (2001). The politics of hegemony: The United States and Iran. Middle East Policy, 8(3).
Bridges, W. (1997). Passages. Press Quality Progress.
Davoud, M., Eslami, M., & Davand, H. (2018). The impact of the Islamic Revolution on the geometry of Islamic resistance power in West Asia. Quarterly Journal of Political Studies of the Islamic World, 7(1). [in Persian]
Esmaili, A. M., & Javadani Moghadam, M. (2019). Rereading the components of the new order being formed in the West Asian region in the light of the Islamic awakening. Islamic Awakening Studies, 9(18). [in Persian]
Gallarotti, G. M. (2016). Compound soft power: The BRICS and the multilateralization of soft power. Journal of Political Power, 9(3).
Hosseini, S. M. (14/6/1402). Understanding the capacity of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and BRICS in containing sanctions. Retrieved from http://www.irdiplomacy.ir/fa/news/2021636 [in Persian]
Jafarpour, R. (1401). Cultural capacities of the Islamic Revolution in the new world order. Bimonthly American Studies, 18. [in Persian]
Jahanbin, F. (1395). The Islamic Republic of Iran and its role in the future multipolar system (Opportunities and challenges). Quarterly Journal of Islamic Revolution Research, 6(20). [in Persian]
Karami, J. (2004). The new international system: Hegemony, multipolarity or uni-multipolarity? Defense Policy Quarterly, 48. [in Persian]
Kolyai, H., Rawan Bad, A., & Haghighi, A. M. (2003). Explanation of changes in the structure of the international system following the Islamic Republic of Iran. Political and International Research Quarterly, 14(55). [in Persian]
Li, Q., & Ye, M. (2019). China’s emerging partnership network: What, who, where, when, and why. Emerald Insight. Retrieved from https://www.emerald.com
Mearsheimer, J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
Naeimi, A. A., Mir Koosheh, A. H., & Mohammadzadeh, A. (2019). The future of international order in the horizon of 2030. Quarterly Journal of International Relations Studies, 13(52). [in Persian]
Nye, J. (2007). The use of soft power (S. R. Mir Taher, Trans.). Defense Strategy Quarterly, 2(6).
Rana, K., & Chatterjee, B. (2010). Economic diplomacy: India’s experience (4th ed.).
Samiei Nasab, M. (2014). Economic diplomacy, strategy to counteract economic sanctions in the system of resistance economy. Quarterly Journal of Security Horizons, 7(25). [in Persian]
Selwyn, J. V. M. (2013). Economic diplomacy: Works: A meta-analysis of its effect on international economic flows. Erasmus University Institute of Social Studies and Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Simber, R., Rezapour, D., & Fazeli, S. (2019). Iran’s opportunities regarding the role of the BRICS group in the multipolar international system. Quarterly Journal of Strategic and Macro-Policies, 7(Special Issue). [in Persian]
Simber, R., & Rezapour, D. (2019). The strategy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the multipolar international system: A case study of the BRICS group. Quarterly Journal of Islamic Revolution Research, 10(34). [in Persian]
Talei Hur, R. (2022). The most important influential areas in the new world order. American Studies Bimonthly, 18. [in Persian]
Walt, S. (2004). Can the United States be balanced? If so, how? Prepared for delivery at the 2004 annual meeting of The American Political Science Association.
Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of international politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Waltz, K. N. (1997). Theory of international politics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Waltz, K. N. (2000). Structural realism after the Cold War. International Security, 25.
Zarif, M. J., Sajjadpour, S. K., & Molaei, A. (2017). The transition period of international relations in the post-Western world. Tehran: Center for Political and International Studies. [in Persian]