.تاثیر سرمایه اجتماعی بر تروریسم در غرب آسیا (2007 تا 2020)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران.

2 دانشیار گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه خورازمی، تهران، ایران..

3 فارغ‌التحصیل دکتری علوم سیاسی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده
تصویر بین‌المللی غرب آسیا به‌ویژه پس از حادثه یازدهم سپتامبر به شدت با تروریسم پیوند خورده است. این امر با ظهور داعش و حملات بی‌شمار آن در اقصی نقاط جهان و بهره‌گیری از خشونت بی‌حد و مرز تشدید شده است. تلاش‌های بسیاری برای تبیین تروریسم انجام شده است، اما اکثر آن‌ها سرمایه اجتماعی را به عنوان مفهومی میان‌رشته‌ای در این زمینه مورد توجه قرار نداده‌اند. بر این اساس، پرسش اصلی مقاله این است که سرمایه اجتماعی چه تاثیری بر تروریسم در غرب آسیا در سال‌های 2007 تا 2020 داشته است؟ برای پاسخ به پرسش مذکور از روش کمّی بهره برده شده و روش جمع‌آوری داده‌ها نیز اسنادی و مبتنی بر استفاده از بانک‌های اطلاعاتی (تحلیل ثانویه) موجود بوده است. همچنین نرم‌افزار SPSS نسخه 22 نیز برای تحلیل داده‌ها استفاده شده است. تحلیل داده‏ها با استفاده از ضریب همبستگی پیرسون و رگرسیون خطی چندمتغیره از نوع گام به گام حاکی از آن است که سرمایه اجتماعی بین‌المللی 50 درصد از تغییرات تعداد گروه‌های تروریستی را تبیین می‏کند، در حالی که اعتماد بین‌المللی تقریبا 83 درصد از تغییرات تعداد حملات گروه‌های تروریستی را توضیح می‏دهد. در نهایت، مشارکت نهادی تقریبا 37 درصد از شدت خشونت اعمالی توسط گروه‌های تروریستی را تبیین می‌کند. با توجه به مقادیر بتا، می‏توان استدلال کرد سرمایه اجتماعی بر تعداد گروه‌های تروریستی تاثیر مثبتی داشته است. مشارکت نهادی و اعتماد بین‌المللی نیز به ترتیب بر شدت خشونت و تعداد حملات گروه‌های تروریستی تاثیر منفی و مثبتی بر جای نهاده است.


 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

The impact of social capital on terrorism in West Asia (2007 to 2020)

نویسندگان English

Abolfazl Delavari 1
Reza Khalili 2
Hamed Mehraban inchehbroun 3
1 Department of Political Science, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Department of Political Science, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Department of Political Science, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

The international image of West Asia, especially after the September 11, 2001 incident, has been strongly linked to terrorism. This has been exacerbated by the emergence of ISIS and its numerous attacks in various parts of the world and the use of extreme violence. Terrorist groups in West Asia generally attract a large population of radical Muslims. Therefore, due to the greater number of terrorist groups and their large number of followers in this region compared to other regions of the world, the intensity of violence and the number of attacks, the terrorist activity of most of these groups is linked to Islam as the dominant ideology in the societies of the region, and thus a certain type of Islamism has become associated with terrorism on a global level. A comprehensive explanation and prevention of terrorism is a very difficult and almost impossible task, however, an attempt is made to consider its various aspects by looking at terrorism from the perspective of social capital as an interdisciplinary concept (political science, sociology and economics). The reason for choosing 2007 as the starting point is, on the one hand, the lack of much of the data required for the previous article, and on the other hand, it is related to the developments of the Arab Spring.
The present study was quantitative in terms of approach; time-based, periodic, and based on secondary data (Legatum and the Global Terrorism Data Center or START, etc.) in terms of data collection. Social capital and terrorism are the independent and dependent variables of the study, respectively. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS version 22 software.
Our target statistical population is the countries of West Asia, but since their number is large for a single study, we focused on 6 specific samples. Purposive sampling of the type of “sampling to achieve representativeness” was considered appropriate for the research objectives. The purpose of choosing this type of purposive sampling was to ensure that the selected sample was representative of the entire Middle East.
Based on the values obtained between institutional social capital and the intensity of violence, i.e. the correlation coefficient (*-0.605) and the significance level (0.022), it can be argued that there is a significant relationship between these two variables. This indicates that as institutional social capital increases, the intensity of violence by terrorist groups decreases. Also, according to the correlation coefficient (**0.737) and the significance level (0.003) obtained between institutional social capital and the number of attacks, it can be said that as social capital increases at this level, the number of attacks by terrorist groups increases. There was also a significant relationship between international social capital and the number of terrorist groups with a correlation coefficient (**0.707) and a significance level (0.005). This indicates that with the increase in international social capital, the number of terrorist groups also increases. The number of their attacks also increases.
The relationship between social capital and the number of terrorist groups: Based on the best-fit model obtained from the stepwise regression analysis, the R2 value obtained (0.731) indicates that 73 percent of the variance in the number of terrorist groups is explained by international social capital and international trust. Also, for each unit change in international social capital and international trust, there is a change of about (3.076) and (-2.417) units in the number of terrorist groups, respectively.
The relationship between social capital and the number of terrorist attacks: Based on the best-fit model obtained from the stepwise regression analysis, the R2 value obtained (0.829) indicates that 83 percent of the variance of the number of attacks variable is explained by international trust.
The relationship between social capital and the intensity of violence of terrorist groups: Based on the best-fit model obtained from stepwise regression analysis, the R2 value obtained (0.367) indicates that 37 percent of the variance in the severity of violence variable is explained by institutional participation.
In this study, focusing on social capital and considering different levels of interpersonal, national or institutional and international, and the components of trust, participation and cohesion, it was concluded that different levels and components of social capital have different effects on the number of terrorist groups, the intensity of violence they commit and the number of their attacks. In such a way that with the increase in social capital and international trust, the number of terrorist groups and the number of their attacks increase; because citizens feel that their rulers act against their values and norms. The colonization of regional countries, the issue of Israel and other factors have caused a very negative attitude towards Western countries to form and persist among the people of the region, unlike the rulers of the region. It was also concluded that the upward trend of institutional participation in society reduces the intensity of violence of terrorist groups; because civil society acts as a social shield against them.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Social capital
trust
participation
cohesion
West Asia
Ali, B. (2016). ISIS, eastern violence and criticism of fascist reason. Markaz. [in Persian]
Asal, V. H., Nagar, N. A., & Rethemeyer, R. K. (2014). Building terrorism from social ties: The dark side of social capital. Civil Wars, 16(4), 402–424.
Atwan, A. (2016). Demonic production of the factors of the emergence of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. Elmi and Farhangi. [in Persian]
Azin, A., & Seifzadeh, A. (2016). Investigating the social and political contexts of the emergence of ISIS in the Middle East. Foreign Policy Quarterly, 29(4), 27–50. [in Persian]
Bankston, C. L., III, & Zhou, M. (2002). Social capital as process: The meanings and problems of a theoretical metaphor. Sociological Inquiry, 72(2), 285–317.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.
Bozorgmehri, M. (2019). A study on motivations and objectives of leaders and rank-and-file fighters in ISIS: Difference or similarity. The Quarterly Journal of Political Studies of the Islamic World, 8(31). [in Persian]
Burt, R. S. (2017). Structural holes versus network closure as social capital. In N. Lin, K. Cook, & R. S. Burt (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 31–56). Routledge.
Çınar, B. (2009). The root causes of terrorism. METU Studies in Development, 36(1), 93–119.
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Harvard University Press.
Delavari, A., Khalili, R., & Mehraban Incheboron, H. (2024). Social explanation of terrorism in West Asia: The impact of trust on terrorism in West Asia from 2007 to 2020. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 27(2), 115–146. [in Persian]
Drew, C. (2022). The 3 types of social capital (bridging, bonding & linking). Helpful Professor. Retrieved from https://helpfulprofessor.com/types-of-social-capital/
Ekhtiari Amiri, R., Alavian, M. and Vali Nataj, A. (2020). Comparative Study of Al-Qaeda and ISIS Groups. The Fundamental and Applied Studies of the Islamic World2(3), 24-57. [in Persian]
Fund for Peace. (2021). Human rights and rule of law index. Fund for Peace.
Ganor, B. (2020). A typology of terrorist attacks: The “32 profiles” model. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 1–17.
Garrison, A. (2003). Terrorism: The nature of its history. Criminal Justice Studies: A Critical Journal of Crime, Law and Society, 16(1), 39–52.
Grootaert, C., & Van Bastelaer, T. (Eds.). (2002). Understanding and measuring social capital: A multidisciplinary tool for practitioners (Vol. 1). World Bank Publications.
Günay, E. K., & Sülün, D. (2021). The evaluation of the impact of social capital on economic development within the framework of the Legatum Prosperity Index: The case of OECD countries. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(80), 1982–1996.
Gurr, T. R. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton University Press.
Hamm, M. S., & Spaaij, R. (2017). The age of lone wolf terrorism. Columbia University Press.
Helfstein, S. (2014). Social capital and terrorism. Defence and Peace Economics, 23(4), 363–380.
Heshmati, A., Rezaei, A., & Toraby, G. (2020). The impact of national identity insecurity on the development of neo-terrorism in the Middle East with an emphasis on Iraq. World Politics, 8(4), 31–60. [in Persian]
Hoffman, B. (2001). Change and continuity in terrorism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 24(5), 417–428.
Kalantari, K., & Noori, F. (2015). Religious terrorism in cyberspace and solutions to deal with it. In The First Conference on Cyberspace and Cultural Developments. [in Persian]
Kaplan, J. (2007). The fifth wave: The new tribalism? Terrorism and Political Violence, 19(4), 545–570.
Kaplan, J. (2010). Terrorist groups and the new tribalism: Terrorism’s fifth wave. Routledge.
Khalili, R., & Mehraban Incheboron, H. (2019). International social capital: A framework for explaining Iran and Saudi Arabia relations. Geopolitics Quarterly, 15(2), 118–145. [in Persian]
Lin, N. (2017). Building a network theory of social capital. In N. Lin, K. Cook, & R. S. Burt (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 3–28). Routledge.
Matthee, S. (2019). The globalising nature of terrorism and the manifestations and implications of new terrorism (Doctoral dissertation). University of Pretoria.
Matusitz, J. (2013). Terrorism & communication: A critical introduction. SAGE Publications.
Mehregan N, Daliri H. (2015). The Relationship between Social Capital and Human Development in the Provinces of Iran. QJER; 15 (2) :117-136
Mohammadi, M. R. Motaghi, E. Suri, H. (2023). Analysis of the fourth wave of modern extreme fundamentalism in the framework of post-organizationalism. The Fundamental and Applied Studies of the Islamic World4(4), 105-127. [in Persian]
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.
Narayan, D. (1999). Bonds and bridges: Social capital and poverty (Vol. 2167). World Bank.
Page, C. (2017, April). Estimating effects of social capital on online social engagement: The 2014 Napa Valley earthquake. Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Annual Conference, Chicago, IL.
Paxton, P. (1999). Is social capital declining in the United States? A multiple indicator assessment. American Journal of Sociology, 105(1), 88–127.
Prosperity. (2021). The Legatum Prosperity Index. Prosperity.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.
Ranjbar, H., et al. (2012). Sampling in qualitative research: A guide to getting started. Annals of Military and Health Sciences Research, 10(3), 238–250. [in Persian]
Rapoport, D. (2022). Waves of global terrorism: From 1879 to the present. Columbia University Press.
Sageman, M. (2004). Understanding terror networks. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Shamaileh, A. (2017). Trust and terror: Social capital and the use of terrorism as a tool of resistance. Taylor & Francis.
Simon, S., & Benjamin, D. (2000). America and the new terrorism. Survival, 42(1), 59–75.
SIPRI. (2021). Military expenditure. SIPRI.
Stapley, C. (2009). Terrorism: Its goals, targets, and strategies. In Terrorism’s unanswered questions. ABC-CLIO.
START. (2019). Islamist terrorist attacks in the world 1979–2019. START.
Szreter, S., & Woolcock, M. (2004). Health by association? Social capital, social theory, and the political economy of public health. International Journal of Epidemiology, 33(4), 650–667.
Taylor, B. J. (2002). Opportunity and discontent: An analysis of mass political violence throughout the world from 1975 to 1994 (Doctoral dissertation, Loyola University Chicago).
Taylor, R. (2002). The history of terrorism. Lucent Books.
The World Bank. (2021). Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$). The World Bank.
Villalonga-Olives, E., & Kawachi, I. (2015). The measurement of social capital. Gaceta Sanitaria, 29, 62–64.
Wilkinson, P. (2011). Terrorism versus democracy: The liberal state response (3rd ed.). Routledge.
World Tourism Organization. (2021). Tourist arrivals. World Tourism Organization.