بررسی مقایسه‌ای گروه‌های مقاومت حشد‌الشعبی عراق و حماس فلسطین

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مطالعات سیاسی انقلاب اسلامی، گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه شاهد، تهران، ایران

2 استاد گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه شاهد، تهران، ایران

3 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد روابط بین الملل، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران

چکیده

در سه دهۀ اخیر، در میان ملت‌های منطقه ‌به‌ویژه شیعیان خاورمیانه، آشکارا شاهد خودآگاهی و ظهور و تقویت جنبش‌های سیاسی‌اجتماعی بوده‌ایم. با توجه به پیامدهای داخلی و خارجی این جنبش‌ها، نقش ‌تأثیر‌گذار آن‌ها را در سطوح تحولات منطقه‌ای و کشوری می‌بینیم. در این مقاله دو گروه مقاومت اسلام‌گرای معاصر، جنبش مقاومت حماس فلسطین و گروه مقاومت حشد‌الشعبی عراق را با یکدیگر مقایسه می‌کنیم. با توجه به شرایط کنونی خاورمیانه، ساختار و تشکیلات این دو گروه در قالب یک دستگاه مفهومی و به‌وسیلۀ مطالعۀ تطبیقی اهمیت دارد. روش بررسی این مقاله توصیفی‌‌اکتشافی است. در پی پاسخ این پرسش هستیم که گروه‌های مقاومت حشدالشعبی و حماس چه تفاوت‌ها و شباهت‌هایی با یکدیگر دارند؟ مقایسۀ این دو گروه مقاومت، دلایل تحولات اساسی و ‌تأثیرگذار اخیر دو کشور عراق و فلسطین را به‌صورت شفاف مشخص می‌کند. گروه مقاومت حشدالشعبی عراق و حماس فلسطین، پیوند عمیقی با انقلاب اسلامی ایران داشته و رشد و نفوذ این گروه‌ها ‌به‌عنوان بازوان حمایتی جمهوری اسلامی بسیار اهمیت دارد. در مقایسۀ هویت این دو گروه مقاومت، قالب گروه مقاومت حشد‌الشعبی عراق، ایدئولوژی اسلامی شیعی و ایدئولوژی جنبش مقاومت حماس ریشه در اخوان‌ المسلمین مصر دارد. شایان توجه اینکه جنبش‌های آزادی‌بخش، همچون هر پدیدۀ اجتماعی دیگر، در گذر زمان و تحت ‌تأثیر شرایط و مؤلفه‌هایی، دچار تحول می‌شوند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

A Comparative Study of the Iraqi Popular Mobilization forces and Palestinian Hamas

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyed Saleh Mousavi 1
  • Mohammad Rahim Eivazi 2
  • Seyed Mohammad Ashrafi, 3
1 PhD Student in Political Studies of the Islamic Revolution, Department of Political Science, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor, Department of Political Science, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran
3 M.A of International Relations, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran
چکیده [English]

Over the past three decades, we have witnessed the emergence and strengthening of socio-political movements among the nations of the region, especially the Shiites of the Middle East. Considering the internal and external consequences of these movements, their effective role can be seen in the levels of regional and national developments. This article compares the two contemporary Islamist resistance groups, the Palestinian Hamas Resistance Movement and the Iraqi Popular Mobilization Force. Given the current situation in the Middle East, the structure and organization of these two groups in the form of a conceptual device and through comparative study is important. The method of reviewing the present article is descriptive-exploratory and the main question is what are the differences and similarities between the popular mobilization forces and Hamas? In response, it must be acknowledged that the comparison of these two resistance groups clearly shows the understanding of the fundamental and influential recent developments between Iraq and Palestine. and the influence of these groups as the support arms of the Islamic Republic is very important
According to the study and using Alan Thorne's conceptual framework, there are relatively obvious similarities and differences between the three components (generality, opposition or conflict and the principle of identity), so that due to the similarities and differences between each of these two resistance groups, in some cases, differences according to the specific circumstances in which they are placed.
Based on the principle of identity, the Iraqi Popular Mobilization Force Group has been formed with a focus on recruiting popular forces, regardless of ethnicity or religion. The emergence of Takfiri terrorism in the West Asian region has also brought significant parts of western Iraq under the control of ISIS. In such circumstances, the inefficiency of the Iraqi army in the fight against terrorism, as well as the decision of the cabinet during the presidency of Nouri al-Maliki to form a people's force to defend the territorial integrity of Iraq and expel terrorists from the country, and finally the issuance of a fatwa on jihad. The Iraqi supreme authority established the Hashad al-Shaabi base for the presence of various segments of the people in the struggle against ISIL.
Comparing the identities of these two resistance groups, it can be said that the Iraqi popular mobilization resistance group has a Shiite Islamic ideology, and the ideology of the Hamas resistance movement is rooted in the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood. Also, the commonalities and differences of these two resistance groups can be expressed as follows; In both groups of resistance, the leading leaders of these currents have been influenced by the Islamic Revolution of Iran and the implementation of these ideas of the Islamic Revolution is evident. The doctrinal and jurisprudential principles of this group, which originated from the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood, have a more Islamic aspect.
Both resistance groups entered the arena of struggle in order to create the necessary conditions for the liberation of the country from oppression and aggression. These groups also have the support of the masses.
The two groups of the popular uprising in Iraq and Hamas in Palestine are deeply connected to the Islamic Revolution of Iran, and the growth and influence of these groups as the support arms of the Islamic Republic is very important. The Popular Mobilization Resistance Group and the Hamas Resistance have common foreign enemies, such as the United States, and with the extent of their activities and influence, they sometimes attack their interests with attacks from these countries.
Given the participation of the Hamas resistance movement in the elections and the acquisition of political legitimacy at home and abroad, the official Hamas organization in the Palestinian state structure is more cohesive than the popular mobilization resistance group in Iraq.
Comparing the identities of these two resistance groups, it can be said that the Iraqi popular mobilization resistance group has a Shiite Islamic ideology, and the ideology of the Hamas resistance movement is rooted in the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood.
We can also see Hamas' strategy in changing the regional approach and distancing the Hamas movement from Iran in recent years according to its interests. It should be noted that liberation movements, like any other social phenomenon, evolve over time and under the influence of conditions and components.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Comparative Study Popular Mobilization forces Hamas
 
Abbasi, Ebrahim; Tabrizi, Zeinat (2015). A Study of the Relations between Iran and the Hamas Movement after the Islamic Awakening, Volume 6, Number 10[In Persian].
 
Abu amr, ziad (1993). Hamas political and historical background, Translated by Morteza Qanun, Political Science Quarterly, Preface No. 2. [In Persian]
Afshon, Touraj; Allah Karam, Abdolhossein (2018). Comparison of the US security approach and the popular uprising in Iraq, Performance and Outlook, Volume 11, Number 42, pp. 72- 41[In Persian]
 
Ahmadian, Hassan (2013). Strategic Suggestions for Facing the New Hamas, Borhan Analytical Site. [In Persian]
Azad, Amir Hamed (2016). The Bright Shadow of the Popular Rally, Tehran: Noor Institute of Thought Studies, 2016, pp. 21-25[In Persian]
 
Azad, Amir Hamed (2020). The pattern of formation and limitation of popular mobilization in Iraq, Scientific Quarterly of World Politics Ninth Volume, Consecutive 33, No. 3, 102-72. [In Persian]
 
Barghouti, Ayad and Javad Al-Hamad (2003). A look at the political thought of the Hamas movement, translated by Seyed Hossein Mousavi, Center for Scientific Research and Strategic Studies in the Middle East [In Persian]
 
Castells, Manuel (2014). Networks of Anger and Hope, translated by Mojtaba Gholipour, Tehran, Markaz Publishing [In Persian].
 
Duman, Bilgay (2016). A New Controversial Actor in Post-ISIS Iraq: Al-Hashd Al-Shaabi Report (The Popular Mobilization Forces), Ankara: ORSAM Report, No: 198
Farhadinia, Hamid (2000). Hamas Political Thought, Movement Quarterly, First Year, No3. [In Persian].
 
Fawzi, Yahiya (2010). Intellectual typology of contemporary Islamic movements and its political-security consequences in the Islamic world, Quarterly Journal of Strategic Studies, Year 13, Issue 4[In Persian].
 
Ghasemi, Ali Pasha (2007). Hamas Victory in Elections, Opportunities and Challenges, Seventh Quarterly Journal of Islamic World Studies, No. 25[In Persian].
 
Hajli, Ali (2007). Understanding and Studying New Social Movements, Jane Cohen et al, Tehran: Society and Culture Publications [In Persian]
 
Khodadadi, Mohammad Ismail (2004). Formation of the Palestinian Intifada, contexts and reasons. Religion and Politics Quarterly, First Year, No. 1[In Persian]
 
Khosravi, Gholamreza (2006). Future Perspectives of the Hamas Movement, Research Report of the Institute for Strategic Studies [In Persian]
 
Lecht, John (1998). Fifty Great Contemporary Thinkers: From Structuralism to Postmodernity, translated by Mohsen Hakimi, Tehran: Khojasteh [In Persian].
 
Mullah Ebrahimi, Ezzat (2005). Contemporary Palestinian Culture, Characters and Movements, Volume 1, Tehran: Noor Thinkers Institute [In Persian].
Nash, Kit (2014). Contemporary Political Sociology: Globalization Politics and Power, translated by Mohammad Taghi Delfrooz, Tehran: Kavir [In Persian].
 
Opter; David E, and Charles F, Andy Payne, Mohammad Reza Saeedabadi; (2001). Political protest and social change; Tehran: Research Institute for Strategic Studies. [In Persian]
Parto, Fathollah (2013). Hamas new approach to changing regional allies, published on the website of Andishekdeh Tebyan [In Persian]
 
Purqiumi, Ayyub (2020). Lessons and Consequences of Popular Resistance in the 22-Day Gaza War, Basij Studies Quarterly. Issue 44 [In Persian]
 
Razavi, Salman (2005). Transformation in Hamas Strategy, Quarterly Journal of Regional Studies of the Islamic World, Year 6, No. 23. [In Persian]
 
Razavi, Salman; Ali Pasha Ghasemi (2012). Hamas government experience, Evaluation and Perspective, Tehran: Noor Institute of Thought Studies [In Persian]
 
Roche, gay (1989). Social Change, translated by Mansour Vosoughi, Tehran: Ney Publishing [In Persian]
 
Tilly, Charles (2017). Social Movements 2004, translated by Ali Morshedizad, Tehran, Imam Sadegh (AS) University [In Persian]
 
Zarean, Ahmad (2014). Rereading Hamas relationship with the axis of resistance after the developments in the Arab world, Quarterly Journal of Strategic Studies of the Islamic World. Q 15. No. 1: Consecutive 75.116-89[In Persian].
 
Zarei, Mohammad (2011). The structure of Hamas organizations from the past to the present, Information newspaper, numbers 25253,25254[In Persian].
 
 
Iraqi facts No. 4429 (2016) Popular Mobilization Authority Law No. 40 of 2016. http://www.iraqld.hjc.iq/pdf/2016/gg0475.pdf [in Arabic]
Cabinet Resolution No. 88 (2015), Iraqi Legislation Base[in Arabic]
The website of the office of His Eminence, the religious authority of Ali Al-Sayyid Ali Al-Husseini Al-Sistani (2014), what was mentioned in the Friday sermon of the representative of the supreme religious authority in Holy Karbala, Sheikh Abdul Mahdi Al-Karbalai on Sha’ban 14 / 1435 AH corresponding to (13/6/2014 AD). [in Arabic]